fix: maybe get context properly again?
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ce89aa6f9
commit
a6015a32ed
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -34,17 +34,15 @@ impl Normalizer for crate::Context {
|
||||||
let mut object_active_model = AP::object_q(&object)?;
|
let mut object_active_model = AP::object_q(&object)?;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// make sure content only contains a safe subset of html
|
// make sure content only contains a safe subset of html
|
||||||
if let Set(Some(content)) = object_active_model.content {
|
if let Ok(content) = object.content() {
|
||||||
object_active_model.content = Set(Some(mdhtml::safe_html(&content)));
|
object_active_model.content = Set(Some(mdhtml::safe_html(content)));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// fix context for remote posts
|
// fix context for remote posts
|
||||||
// > note that this will effectively recursively try to fetch the parent object, in order to find
|
// > if any link is broken or we get rate limited, the whole insertion fails which is
|
||||||
// > the context (which is id of topmost object). there's a recursion limit of 16 hidden inside
|
|
||||||
// > btw! also if any link is broken or we get rate limited, the whole insertion fails which is
|
|
||||||
// > kind of dumb. there should be a job system so this can be done in waves. or maybe there's
|
// > kind of dumb. there should be a job system so this can be done in waves. or maybe there's
|
||||||
// > some whole other way to do this?? im thinking but misskey aaaa!! TODO
|
// > some whole other way to do this?? im thinking but misskey aaaa!! TODO
|
||||||
if let Set(Some(ref reply)) = object_active_model.in_reply_to {
|
if let Ok(reply) = object.in_reply_to().id() {
|
||||||
if let Some(o) = crate::model::object::Entity::find_by_ap_id(reply).one(tx).await? {
|
if let Some(o) = crate::model::object::Entity::find_by_ap_id(reply).one(tx).await? {
|
||||||
object_active_model.context = Set(o.context);
|
object_active_model.context = Set(o.context);
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue